Use 2 to 10 reps
Estimates from heavier sets hold up better. In Reynolds and colleagues’ study, a 5-rep max predicted the 1RM more accurately than a 10- or 20-rep max. Above 10 reps this calculator flags the result as a rough guide.
// FREE CALCULATOR //
Enter the weight and reps from a hard set to get your estimated one-rep max (1RM): the heaviest single you could likely lift. It uses the Epley formula, weight × (1 + reps ÷ 30), which is the one the IronLedger app uses for your records, with Brzycki beside it.
// ESTIMATED 1RM //
262.5 lb
From 225 lb × 5 with Epley. Brzycki gives 253.1 lb.
| % of 1RM | Load (lb) |
|---|---|
| 100% | 262.5 |
| 95% | 249.5 |
| 90% | 236.5 |
| 85% | 223 |
| 80% | 210 |
| 75% | 197 |
| 70% | 184 |
| 65% | 170.5 |
| 60% | 157.5 |
| 55% | 144.5 |
| 50% | 131.5 |
| Reps | Load (lb) | % of 1RM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 262.5 | 100% |
| 2 | 246 | 93.8% |
| 3 | 238.5 | 90.9% |
| 4 | 231.5 | 88.2% |
| 5 | 225 | 85.7% |
| 6 | 219 | 83.3% |
| 7 | 213 | 81.1% |
| 8 | 207 | 78.9% |
| 9 | 202 | 76.9% |
| 10 | 197 | 75% |
| 11 | 192 | 73.2% |
| 12 | 187.5 | 71.4% |
// THE MATH, IN THE OPEN //
// EPLEY //
1RM = weight × (1 + reps ÷ 30)
// BRZYCKI //
1RM = weight × 36 ÷ (37 − reps)
Worked example, 100 kg × 5: Epley gives 100 × (1 + 5 ÷ 30) = 116.7 kg; Brzycki gives 100 × 36 ÷ 32 = 112.5 kg. A single is the weight itself in both.
The tables under the calculator run the formula backwards. The percentage table is your estimate multiplied out, for programs written in percentages. The rep table is the load the formula expects you to manage for each rep count: the same projection as the rep-max table in IronLedger’s Analytics, rounded to the nearest 0.5.
// WHEN TO TRUST IT //
Estimates from heavier sets hold up better. In Reynolds and colleagues’ study, a 5-rep max predicted the 1RM more accurately than a 10- or 20-rep max. Above 10 reps this calculator flags the result as a rough guide.
The formulas assume the set was the most reps you could do. If you stopped with reps left, the estimate comes out low. Add those reps back with the RPE calculator, which reads RPE as reps in reserve.
Epley and Brzycki agree exactly at 10 reps. Below that, Brzycki is lower; above it, Brzycki is higher, and the gap grows quickly: for 100 kg × 15, Epley says 150 kg and Brzycki 163.6 kg.
It tells you roughly where your strength is and which way it is moving. It does not promise what you would lift on a maximal attempt on the day, and it should not be used to pick a competition opener.
// PUTTING IT TO WORK //
Most percentage-based programs need a max to work from. Here is where this number goes.
Programs such as 5/3/1 prescribe each set as a percentage of a training max, a number set below your estimate on purpose. IronLedger’s 5/3/1 setup uses 90% of a tested or estimated 1RM by default.
An estimated 1RM lets you compare a set of 8 in one block with a set of 3 in the next. That is why IronLedger charts it per lift; see how estimated 1RM works for the longer version.
If your program gives a target RPE instead of a percentage, use the RPE calculator to turn your max and the target into a starting load.
// DIRECT ANSWERS //
Do a set of a weight you can lift for 2 to 10 good reps, taken close to failure, then apply a formula. With Epley, 1RM = weight × (1 + reps ÷ 30), so 100 kg for 5 reps estimates 116.7 kg. The only way to know a true 1RM is to test a single, which needs a proper warm-up and a spotter.
Epley is weight × (1 + reps ÷ 30); Brzycki is weight × 36 ÷ (37 − reps). They agree exactly at 10 reps. Below 10 reps Brzycki gives the lower estimate (112.5 kg against Epley’s 116.7 kg for 100 kg × 5), and above 10 reps it gives the higher one.
It is close when the set is heavy and close to failure, and less reliable as reps climb. In one study of the bench press and leg press, estimates from a 5-rep max were more accurate than from a 10- or 20-rep max, and the authors advised using no more than 10 reps (Reynolds et al., 2006).
Because a single is a 1RM as lifted. This calculator and the IronLedger app both treat one rep as the weight itself. Applying Epley’s formula to one rep would add 3.3%, which would make a single look stronger than it was.
A deliberately conservative number that a program takes its percentages from, so the early weeks feel manageable and there is room to progress. IronLedger’s 5/3/1 setup uses 90% of a tested or estimated 1RM by default, and you can change it.
Yes. IronLedger estimates a 1RM from every set you log with the same Epley formula, keeps your best for each lift as a record and charts the trend. The app rounds the stored record to a whole number; this calculator shows one decimal.
// SOURCES //
IronLedger estimates your 1RM from every set you log, keeps your best for each lift as a record and charts it over time, with the same Epley formula. Free, with no subscription. iPhone now; Android is in closed testing.
Get IronLedger free on iOSThe same calculation is a free JSON API at /api/tools/one-rep-max and a tool on the IronLedger MCP server, so an assistant can run it and link back to this page with your numbers.
// MORE TOOLS //
Estimate your max bench from a set of reps, with bench-specific notes on what counts as a rep.
Turn RPE and reps into a percentage of your max, estimate a max from an RPE set, or find the load for a target.
Which plates go on each side of the bar, for any bar, in kg or lb, with the plates you actually own.